From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)ohmu(dot)fi>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tobias Oberstein <tobias(dot)oberstein(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: pread() and pwrite() |
Date: | 2018-10-09 02:27:48 |
Message-ID: | CAEepm=1FDQOTtpSDP+VX15t1F+cg1jOHKNs-NNM=qFYYk_0++w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 2:55 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > Rebased again. Patches that touch AC_CHECK_FUNCS are fun like that!
>
> Yeah, I've been burnt by that too recently. It occurs to me we could make
> that at least a little less painful if we formatted the macro with one
> line per function name:
>
> AC_CHECK_FUNCS([
> cbrt
> clock_gettime
> fdatasync
> ...
> wcstombs_l
> ])
>
> You'd still get conflicts in configure itself, of course, but that
> doesn't require manual work to resolve -- just re-run autoconf.
+1, was about to suggest the same!
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-10-09 02:39:39 | Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-10-09 02:26:42 | Re: Function for listing archive_status directory |