Re: Funny hang on PostgreSQL 10 during parallel index scan on slave

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: chris(dot)travers(at)adjust(dot)com
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Funny hang on PostgreSQL 10 during parallel index scan on slave
Date: 2018-09-05 16:53:42
Message-ID: CAEepm=0wxbhHtL9ztScvE4f-Bx1bvZjDLn44g7ekcCCJFbuw4g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:49 AM Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)adjust(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Will submit a patch here shortly. Thanks! Should we do for master and 10? Or 9.6 too?
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:40 PM Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)adjust(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Yep, Maybe we should check for signals there.

Yeah, it seems reasonable to check for interrupts here. It would need
to be back-patched as far as 9.4.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-09-05 16:55:11 Re: Funny hang on PostgreSQL 10 during parallel index scan on slave
Previous Message Chris Travers 2018-09-05 16:48:44 Re: Funny hang on PostgreSQL 10 during parallel index scan on slave