From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |
Date: | 2018-01-25 07:11:22 |
Message-ID: | CAEepm=0rifp5cfM8a+pT=vkkcAGFzway8wubxBOm4q-RYoAVcQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Huh. That was simpler than I thought.
>
> Attached rebased versions.
Hi Claudio,
FYI the regression test seems to have some run-to-run variation.
Though it usually succeeds, recently I have seen a couple of failures
like this:
========= Contents of ./src/test/regress/regression.diffs
*** /home/travis/build/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/src/test/regress/expected/vacuum.out
2018-01-24 01:41:28.200454371 +0000
--- /home/travis/build/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/src/test/regress/results/vacuum.out
2018-01-24 01:51:07.970049937 +0000
***************
*** 128,134 ****
SELECT pg_relation_size('vactst', 'main');
pg_relation_size
------------------
! 0
(1 row)
SELECT count(*) FROM vactst;
--- 128,134 ----
SELECT pg_relation_size('vactst', 'main');
pg_relation_size
------------------
! 8192
(1 row)
SELECT count(*) FROM vactst;
======================================================================
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-01-25 07:26:00 | Re: [PATCH] Logical decoding of TRUNCATE |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-01-25 07:02:54 | Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0 |