From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Subject: | Re: COPY vs. transition tables |
Date: | 2017-07-09 23:02:15 |
Message-ID: | CAEepm=0YVDCYqrV8YCvPmLwJuy9qosH4OC4MmJzKq807JSXLUQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 8:42 PM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
>> Using the script attached, I'm getting this very odd result set below.
>>
>> Audit records from COPY to the "foo bar" table aren't getting
>> recorded, but audit records from COPY to the baz table are.
>
> Thanks for the bug report. I think it's the presence of the index on
> "foo bar", not the space in its name (but thanks for that curve
> ball!), that causes these tuples not to be captured.
> CopyFromInsertBatch takes a different path depending on whether there
> are any indexes, and mistakenly passes NULL for transition_capture.
> The attached seems to fix it, but I'll look more closely and send a
> version with a regression test on Monday.
Here it is. Added to open items.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
copy-with-indexes-and-transitions-v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Álvaro Hernández Tortosa | 2017-07-10 00:29:01 | Re: Authentification method on client side checking |
Previous Message | Martin Mai | 2017-07-09 20:21:27 | Re: [PATCH] Minor typo in the source repository documentation |