| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query |
| Date: | 2017-12-13 04:30:51 |
| Message-ID: | CAEepm=0NmVG=z-8XLeHxQwWYDa3kyUodb5XCJQKZ5CKgwK19oQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Haribabu Kommi
<kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for explaining the problem in generating an isolation test to
> test the serialize parallel query.
>
> Committer can decide whether existing test is fine to part of the test suite
> or remove it, other than that everything is fine. so I am moving the patch
> into "ready for committer" state.
Thank you! I will try to find a good benchmark that will really
exercise parallel query + SSI.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kuntal Ghosh | 2017-12-13 05:03:17 | Re: Parallel Index Scan vs BTP_DELETED and BTP_HALF_DEAD |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2017-12-13 04:17:25 | Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status |