Re: New Slave - timeline ERROR

From: "drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com" <drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New Slave - timeline ERROR
Date: 2016-01-10 00:33:15
Message-ID: CAE_gQfX9r4CGeXo1iz8jdK7D3gtnR8sD+=nmm=F9cXP3k-nbXA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Should I point of replication new slave to same DB?

Lucas

On Sunday, 10 January 2016, bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 2:35 PM, drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com');> <
> drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com');>> wrote:
>
>> rsync -azr --progress --partial postgres(at)$MASTER_IP:
>>> /var/lib/postgresql/data/var/lib/postgresql/data/ --exclude
>>> postmaster.pid
>>
>>
>> Ah ok! So this will do an incrementa, right? not supposed to copy ALL the
>> base/ again?
>>
>
> Yes, this is for incremental copying from the upstream source.
> Actually, you don't need the -r with -a (it is implied), and you can run
> it first with --dry-run to see what it _would_ do.
> If you are not shipping over the WAN, then omit the -z flag as you do not
> need compression.
>

--

Lucas Possamai

kinghost.co.nz
<http://forum.kinghost.co.nz/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2&sid=e999f8370385657a65d41d5ff60b0b38>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2016-01-10 00:37:50 Re: New Slave - timeline ERROR
Previous Message bricklen 2016-01-09 22:40:41 Re: New Slave - timeline ERROR