From: | Lucas Possamai <drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Unused indexes - PostgreSQL 9.2 |
Date: | 2016-05-24 00:33:07 |
Message-ID: | CAE_gQfWNBT_nfW49=7ekJyPqZ+3+BnEsHERv0a+giGspYKzwsA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 24 May 2016 at 12:18, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Lucas Possamai <drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > That index has been added just 3 hours ago, and you can see that the
> > times_used goes over 41000.... How is that possible??
>
> Well, that is what it is there for, right , to be used? My ancient
> laptop can use an index that many times in less than 20 seconds,
> running flat out.
>
>
Yeah!
But I mean... over 70.000 times in 4 hours? that's a lot of usage! ahhahaha
> >
> > Don't think the query is right.
> >
> > Can you please check ?
>
> The query seems right to me.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeff
>
I think the query is ok.. just wanna understand if that value is correct :O
If it is.. I'm happy with that. Just shows the work of finding and creating
the index worthed it.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-05-24 00:42:33 | Re: Unused indexes - PostgreSQL 9.2 |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2016-05-24 00:18:09 | Re: Unused indexes - PostgreSQL 9.2 |