Re: BUG #18600: Getting wait_type_event as IPC:BTreePage for count queries

From: Aditya Singh <aditya(dot)singh(at)lji(dot)io>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #18600: Getting wait_type_event as IPC:BTreePage for count queries
Date: 2024-09-05 15:04:22
Message-ID: CAE_cSysjLKQfi9sSy=xybQ0iUWJso2EkT7w5iOFE-KcASFp0tg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

*QUERY 1: *
*explain select count(*) from activities_bit_old where id > 0; (id column
data-type is int4)*Finalize Aggregate (cost=75709053.22..75709053.23
rows=1 width=8)
-> Gather (cost=75709053.00..75709053.21 rows=2 width=8)
Workers Planned: 2
-> Partial Aggregate (cost=75708053.00..75708053.01 rows=1
width=8)
-> Parallel Index Only Scan using activities_bit_pkey on
activities_bit_old (cost=0.58..73513797.33 rows=877702270 width=0)
Index Cond: (id > 0)

*QUERY 2*: *explain select count(*) from activities_bit where id > 0; (id
column data-type is int8)*
Finalize Aggregate (cost=117811065.69..117811065.70 rows=1 width=8)
-> Gather (cost=117811065.48..117811065.69 rows=2 width=8)
Workers Planned: 2
-> Partial Aggregate (cost=117810065.48..117810065.49 rows=1
width=8)
-> Parallel Index Only Scan using activities_bit_copy_pkey
on activities_bit (cost=0.58..115695086.65 rows=845991530 width=0)
Index Cond: (id > 0)

Above mentioned is the query plan for Table 1 and Table 2;

On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 7:11 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> wrote:

> On 9/5/24 10:11, Aditya Singh wrote:
> > The query on the first table didn't hit the wait event; it hit on the
> > second table. I can show you the same on RDS Database Insights. Both
> > tables have the same *Indexes*, *Data*, and *Columns*. There is only a
> > difference in the ID datatype. Is there any possibility of scheduling a
> > call to troubleshoot this issue since it is happening in the Production
> > environment?
> >
>
> As this is a RDS database, you should probably talk to AWS support?
>
> Other than that, share the explain plans for the two queries (as I asked
> in my previous response).
>
> BTW please don't top post. It's customary to reply inline on this list.
>
>
> regards
>
> --
> Tomas Vondra
>

--

*Confidentiality Warning:*
This message and any attachments are intended
only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or other use of this message
and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If received in error, please
notify the sender immediately and permanently delete it.

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haifang Wang (Centific Technologies Inc) 2024-09-05 17:18:22 RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Windows Application Issues | PostgreSQL | REF # 48475607
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2024-09-05 14:47:33 Re: BUG #18603: Yum repo does not contain 16.x version for Centos/RH/OEL7