Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)
Date: 2014-04-05 07:55:01
Message-ID: CAEZATCXXyUU2=tVW-w13fbecr+2GPpN=ajvaeEwMxxiJbaqUrQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5 April 2014 08:38, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> [snip] releasing it in this state feels a little half-baked
> to me.
>

I regret writing that almost as soon as I sent it. The last of those
queries is now over 10 times faster than HEAD, which is certainly
worthwhile. What bugs me is that there is so much more potential in
this patch.

I think it's pretty close to being committable, but I fear that time
is running out for 9.4.

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Emre Hasegeli 2014-04-05 10:30:45 Re: GiST support for inet datatypes
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2014-04-05 07:38:55 Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP)