From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Row-Level Security Policies (RLS) |
Date: | 2015-07-30 13:52:18 |
Message-ID: | CAEZATCXXedKjZCwrkXd6hixx6_YS11XiB62Uybsno-D_nfw8Uw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 30 July 2015 at 01:35, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/01/2015 02:21 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> While going through this, I spotted another issue --- in a DML
>> query with additional non-target relations, such as UPDATE t1 ..
>> FROM t2 .., the old code was checking the UPDATE policies of both
>> t1 and t2, but really I think it ought to be checking the SELECT
>> policies of t2 (in the same way as this query requires SELECT table
>> permissions on t2, not UPDATE permissions). I've changed that and
>> added new regression tests to test that change.
>
> I assume the entire refactoring patch needs a fair bit of work to
> rebase against current HEAD,
Actually, there haven't been any conflicting changes so far, so a git
rebase was able to automatically merge correctly -- new patch
attached, with some minor comment rewording (not affecting the bug-fix
part).
Even so, I agree that it makes sense to apply the bug-fix separately,
since it's not really anything to do with the refactoring.
> but I picked out the attached to address
> just the above issue. Does this look correct, and if so does it make
> sense to apply at least this part right now?
>
Looks correct to me.
Thanks.
Regards,
Dean
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
rls-refactoring.patch | text/x-patch | 49.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-07-30 16:11:45 | pgsql: Avoid some zero-divide hazards in the planner. |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2015-07-30 11:51:31 | pgsql: Fix calculation of latency of pgbench backslash commands. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2015-07-30 13:58:44 | Re: creating extension including dependencies |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2015-07-30 13:47:59 | Re: multivariate statistics / patch v7 |