From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Manuel Rigger <rigger(dot)manuel(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Failed assertion clauses != NIL |
Date: | 2019-11-21 12:29:39 |
Message-ID: | CAEZATCXXF82RXJzUZATPo3OsKn137ojxNSz83LgsxhDhzVmVjg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 15:08, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Yes, adding the condition to statext_mcv_clauselist_selectivity() would
> make this go away, and it's about the simplest solution.
>
It's probably worth going a little further, and verifying that
stat_clauses references at least two attributes. We do that further up
for the original clause list, but it may not be true for the filtered
list. For example, given a WHERE clause like
c0 > 0 AND c0 < 10 AND (c0 = 0 OR c1 = 1 OR c2 = 2)
and stats on (c0, c1), stat_clauses would include the first 2 clauses,
but they only reference 1 column, so it would be preferable to not use
the multivariate stats in that case.
> Ideally, we'd be able to improve the statistics matching to recognize
> it has to match all three attributes to match the clause, which in this
> case would mean the OR clause is passed to clause_selectivity, and we do
> some magic with extended statistics there.
>
> I'll see how complex / backpatchable that would be.
>
Yes, that seems like a worthwhile thing to do, but I think it goes
beyond what would normally be back-patched. It would really be a
feature enhancement rather than a bug fix.
Regards,
Dean
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ondřej Jirman | 2019-11-21 12:59:13 | Re: BUG #16129: Segfault in tts_virtual_materialize in logical replication worker |
Previous Message | Ondřej Jirman | 2019-11-21 11:53:26 | Re: BUG #16129: Segfault in tts_virtual_materialize in logical replication worker |