Re: gamma() and lgamma() functions

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: gamma() and lgamma() functions
Date: 2024-09-06 11:58:10
Message-ID: CAEZATCXL6SBvFeN_WeWFGbkS_cGSS4R+vkEoo626iuMFFSXYzg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 6 Sept 2024 at 10:42, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> ... assuming that tgamma() and lgamma() behave according to spec ...

Nope, that was too much to hope for. Let's see if this fares any better.

Regards,
Dean

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-gamma-and-lgamma.patch text/x-patch 8.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2024-09-06 13:13:43 Re: Refactoring postmaster's code to cleanup after child exit
Previous Message Jakub Wartak 2024-09-06 11:56:58 Re: scalability bottlenecks with (many) partitions (and more)