Re: vacuumdb/clusterdb/reindexdb: allow specifying objects to process in all databases

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuumdb/clusterdb/reindexdb: allow specifying objects to process in all databases
Date: 2024-03-05 23:20:13
Message-ID: CAEZATCX2FoAq_c1=z=cCy0xi32ZY4ZG887KL4_abSno_yDXUhw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 02:22, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I saw that this thread was referenced elsewhere [0], so I figured I'd take
> a fresh look. From a quick glance, I'd say 0001 and 0002 are pretty
> reasonable and could probably be committed for v17.
>

I'm not sure how useful these changes are, but I don't really object.
You need to update the synopsis section of the docs though.

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-03-05 23:25:16 Re: Hooking into ExplainOneQuery() complicated by missing standard_ExplainOneQuery
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2024-03-05 23:13:46 Re: pg_upgrade --copy-file-range