Re: Re: Added prosupport function for estimating numeric generate_series rows

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "tsinghualucky912(at)foxmail(dot)com" <tsinghualucky912(at)foxmail(dot)com>
Cc: dgrowleyml <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, tgl <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, japinli <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Re: Added prosupport function for estimating numeric generate_series rows
Date: 2024-12-02 11:55:16
Message-ID: CAEZATCX13DtBZzSxxF28L3L3dXvDpXJscnYdFr+QtuP6tMLn0w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 at 00:38, tsinghualucky912(at)foxmail(dot)com
<tsinghualucky912(at)foxmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Dear Dean Rasheed, I have reviewed the v4 patch and it is very thoughtful and reasonable, with a very clever attention to detail (plus I am very happy that we can get rid of the goto, which I was not a big fan of).
>
> This patch looks very good and I have no complaints about it. Thanks again for your help from beginning to end!
>

Cool. Patch committed.

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Lakhin 2024-12-02 13:00:00 Re: RISC-V animals sporadically produce weird memory-related failures
Previous Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2024-12-02 11:46:45 RE: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication