| From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RLS open items are vague and unactionable |
| Date: | 2015-09-13 13:39:06 |
| Message-ID: | CAEZATCWzjQXYH3KQVAPNTb+U-atM2a+1r6cPEK4+jZtdS6Emyw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11 September 2015 at 15:51, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> On 09/11/2015 04:33 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> * Dean Rasheed (dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>>> I will happily work up a rebased version of the patch, but only if I
>>> get a serious commitment from a committer to review it. Otherwise,
>>> I'll let it drop.
>>
>> There's no question about getting it reviewed and moving it forward;
>> either Joe or myself will certainly be able to handle that if others
>> don't step up.
>
> Yes, we'll get it done.
>
OK, here's a rebased version of the patch.
There are no significant changes from last time this was discussed. I
believe the module regression test changes are harmless --- a result
of a change in the order that SB quals are added (internal policies
are now always added/checked before external ones), which can
influence qual pushdown.
Regards,
Dean
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| rls-refactoring.patch | text/x-patch | 46.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Charles Clavadetscher | 2015-09-13 14:25:53 | Re: [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY |
| Previous Message | Charles Clavadetscher | 2015-09-13 13:26:58 | Re: [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY |