Re: RLS open items are vague and unactionable

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RLS open items are vague and unactionable
Date: 2015-09-13 13:39:06
Message-ID: CAEZATCWzjQXYH3KQVAPNTb+U-atM2a+1r6cPEK4+jZtdS6Emyw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11 September 2015 at 15:51, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> On 09/11/2015 04:33 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> * Dean Rasheed (dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>>> I will happily work up a rebased version of the patch, but only if I
>>> get a serious commitment from a committer to review it. Otherwise,
>>> I'll let it drop.
>>
>> There's no question about getting it reviewed and moving it forward;
>> either Joe or myself will certainly be able to handle that if others
>> don't step up.
>
> Yes, we'll get it done.
>

OK, here's a rebased version of the patch.

There are no significant changes from last time this was discussed. I
believe the module regression test changes are harmless --- a result
of a change in the order that SB quals are added (internal policies
are now always added/checked before external ones), which can
influence qual pushdown.

Regards,
Dean

Attachment Content-Type Size
rls-refactoring.patch text/x-patch 46.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles Clavadetscher 2015-09-13 14:25:53 Re: [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY
Previous Message Charles Clavadetscher 2015-09-13 13:26:58 Re: [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY