From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: how to find out whether a view is updatable |
Date: | 2013-07-11 09:06:30 |
Message-ID: | CAEZATCWXC6PkdyyibHC8Q53XmriQSUfo82oo07KoPVk2m7dJEA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 19 June 2013 18:12, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On 6/19/13 11:50 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> On 19 June 2013 15:22, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>>> We still don't have any support for this in psql, do we?
>>>
>>
>> No, but at least we now have an API that psql can use.
>>
>> There are still a number of questions about the best way to display it in psql.
>> Should it be another column in \d+'s list of relations?
>> Should it appear in \d+ for a single relation?
>> Should it distinguish updatable from insertable and deletable?
>> Should tab-completion also be modified?
>>
>> Currently I'm thinking yes, yes, no, yes.
>
> I would be satisfied with no, yes, no, no. Although I don't know what
> tab completion changes you have in mind.
>
Here's a patch that does that for foreign tables and views. It regards
"updatable" as support for *any* of the DML operations. Bernd Helmle
has written a patch for tab completion.
Regards,
Dean
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
psql-describe.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2013-07-11 09:55:40 | Re: docbook-xsl version for release builds |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-07-11 08:28:55 | mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext |