From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Numeric x^y for negative x |
Date: | 2021-07-07 17:36:56 |
Message-ID: | CAEZATCWAiXp7ocU3AMV6Pyvgv3O8x4-UBY+d=w+pziXXegdyOA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 at 14:17, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 at 12:08, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Numeric x^y is supported for x < 0 if y is an integer, but this
> > currently fails if y is outside the range of an int32
>
> I've been doing some more testing of this, and I spotted another
> problem with numeric_power().
>
> [loss of precision and overflow errors]
>
> I think we should attempt to avoid all such overflow errors,
> that are actually underflows, and return zero instead.
>
Finally getting back to this ... attached is an updated patch that now
includes a fix for the loss-of-precision bug and the overflow errors.
I don't think it's really worth trying to split these up, since
they're all somewhat interrelated.
Regards,
Dean
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
numeric-power-fixes.patch | text/x-patch | 7.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Christensen | 2021-07-07 17:44:55 | Re: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output |
Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2021-07-07 17:32:15 | re: Why ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET (slot_name='none') requires subscription disabled? |