On 18 July 2018 at 14:01, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Thanks for the updated version. This looks safer to me. It is possible
> to simplify the code by removing the external RAND_status() call and
> check for RAND_status() first in the loop as per the attached.
OK, thanks.
Barring any further comments, I'll push and back-patch this to v10
later this week.
Regards,
Dean