Re: Improving RLS qual pushdown

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improving RLS qual pushdown
Date: 2015-04-28 06:57:01
Message-ID: CAEZATCW4TiCojhNHC0Q4bZ4LNFbhSQWdvCmf0KMMk=8=hFpfFw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 27 April 2015 at 17:33, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Dean,
>
> * Dean Rasheed (dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> I took another look at this and came up with some alternate comment
>> rewording. I also added a couple of additional comments that should
>> hopefully clarify the code a bit.
>
> Finally got back to this. Made a few additional changes that made
> things look clearer, to me at least, and added documentation and
> comments. Also added a bit to the regression tests (in particular, an
> explicit check on the RLS side of this, not that it should be different,
> but just in case things diverge in the future). Please review and let
> me know if you see any issues.
>

Thanks, that all looks very good.

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-04-28 10:38:45 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0, parser/executor stuff
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-04-28 06:49:39 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0