Re: Improving EXPLAIN's display of SubPlan nodes

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Chantal Keller <chantal(dot)keller(at)universite-paris-saclay(dot)fr>
Subject: Re: Improving EXPLAIN's display of SubPlan nodes
Date: 2024-03-19 21:49:07
Message-ID: CAEZATCW-zgYUB_mu2pjPqOzjAuPXMuqEruD-22zdvKCZxNHu_w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 21:40, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I'm inclined to leave that alone. The actual source sub-SELECT
> could only have had one column, so no real confusion is possible.
> Yeah, there's a resjunk grouping column visible in the plan as well,
> but those exist in many other queries, and we've not gotten questions
> about them.
>

Fair enough. I have no further comments.

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2024-03-19 22:07:21 Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-03-19 21:40:16 Re: Improving EXPLAIN's display of SubPlan nodes