Re: Proof of concept: auto updatable views [Review of Patch]

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, "robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proof of concept: auto updatable views [Review of Patch]
Date: 2012-12-08 16:01:33
Message-ID: CAEZATCVRVapRGNM54j6Jxk=ch7R1LzQq0yEwDPA08R6gj7wNEA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8 December 2012 15:21, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Continuing to work on this ... I found multiple things I didn't like
> about the permission-field update code. Attached are some heavily
> commented extracts from the code as I've changed it. Does anybody
> object to either the code or the objectives given in the comments?

Thanks for looking at this. The new, adjusted code looks good to me.

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2012-12-08 16:07:31 Re: Failing SSL connection due to weird interaction with openssl
Previous Message Andres Freund 2012-12-08 16:01:07 Re: parallel pg_dump