| From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #7873: pg_restore --clean tries to drop tables that don't exist |
| Date: | 2013-12-05 06:22:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAEZATCVLAeRZoNCwS--00OnhSjCbtaP+viWyOMOFV69S4AnRYQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 5 December 2013 01:33, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Can someone in this thread clarify the commit fest situation? I see two
> entries that appear to be the same:
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1174
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1175
>
> I think the first one is a duplicate or obsolete.
>
#1174 looks to be a separate feature. I don't think it's dependent on
#1175 from a code standpoint, but it probably needs it to work
properly in all situations.
I think #1175 is close to being ready for commit. Pavel, will you
produce an updated patch based on our last discussion? I'll set this
patch to waiting on author.
Regards,
Dean
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | d.shumilov | 2013-12-05 09:07:33 | BUG #8658: Errors during restore database |
| Previous Message | Maciek Sakrejda | 2013-12-05 05:29:21 | Re: BUG #8656: Duplicate data violating unique constraints |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Golub | 2013-12-05 06:57:41 | Re: Proposal: variant of regclass |
| Previous Message | Sergey Muraviov | 2013-12-05 06:09:47 | Re: Problem with displaying "wide" tables in psql |