From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: WIP patch (v2) for updatable security barrier views |
Date: | 2014-01-23 10:06:25 |
Message-ID: | CAEZATCVAqJV5WTjLmyObP21n+CzhbEx2AOzH4e6qmTcueVDjdQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 21 January 2014 09:18, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yes, please review the patch from 09-Jan
> (http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEZATCUiKxOg=vOOvjA2S6G-sixzzxg18ToTggP8zOBq6QnQHQ@mail.gmail.com)
>
After further testing I found a bug --- it involves having a security
barrier view on top of a base relation that has a rule that rewrites
the query to have a different result relation, and possibly also a
different command type, so that the securityQuals are no longer on the
result relation, which is a code path not previously tested and the
rowmark handling was wrong. That's probably a pretty obscure case in
the context of security barrier views, but that code path would be
used much more commonly if RLS were built on top of this. Fortunately
the fix is trivial --- updated patch attached.
Regards,
Dean
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
updatable-sb-views.patch | text/x-diff | 63.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2014-01-23 10:25:59 | Re: WIP patch (v2) for updatable security barrier views |
Previous Message | Steeve Lennmark | 2014-01-23 10:01:55 | Re: [PATCH] Relocation of tablespaces in pg_basebackup |