Re: Improving EXPLAIN's display of SubPlan nodes

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Chantal Keller <chantal(dot)keller(at)universite-paris-saclay(dot)fr>
Subject: Re: Improving EXPLAIN's display of SubPlan nodes
Date: 2024-03-18 23:58:11
Message-ID: CAEZATCUzo-GnuEy8Y=5tuL=32CQy6JCDF7VxajGpm_cv6HHKjw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 at 23:19, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > Hm. I used "rescan(SubPlan)" in the attached, but it still looks
> > a bit odd to my eye.
>
> After thinking a bit more, I understood what was bothering me about
> that notation: it looks too much like a call of a user-defined
> function named "rescan()". I think we'd be better off with the
> all-caps "RESCAN()".
>

Or perhaps move the parentheses, and write "(rescan SubPlan N)" or
"(reset SubPlan N)". Dunno.

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-03-18 23:59:30 Re: Autogenerate some wait events code and documentation
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-03-18 23:39:11 Re: Autogenerate some wait events code and documentation