Re: Numeric x^y for negative x

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Numeric x^y for negative x
Date: 2021-10-01 06:56:33
Message-ID: CAEZATCUnutY0BA2Y=Y4AiWL3__Wj4i42uJhcTkDYLmm8gJ8jOg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 18:25, Jaime Casanova
<jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
>
> Are you planning to commit this soon?
>

Yes, I'll take a look at it next week.

I think it's worth backpatching, despite the fact that it's a pretty
obscure corner case that probably isn't affecting anyone -- similar
fixes in this area have been backpatched, and keeping the code in the
back branches in sync will help with future maintenance and testing,
if any other bugs are found.

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-10-01 06:57:54 Re: PoC Refactor AM analyse API
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-10-01 06:55:59 Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend