Re: 9.4 release notes

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.4 release notes
Date: 2014-05-14 16:40:04
Message-ID: CAEZATCUPOcJkyzNFB01Zx=++WcshKhsgWhR9x7Uj44eEFesTsQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 14 May 2014 15:07, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:33:15AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> On 4 May 2014 13:46, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> > I have completed the initial version of the 9.4 release notes. You can
>> > view them here:
>> >
>> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-4.html
>> >
>> > I will be adding additional markup in the next few days.
>> >
>> > Feedback expected and welcomed. I expect to be modifying this until we
>> > release 9.4 final. I have marked items where I need help with question
>> > marks.
>> >
>>
>> In a few places, I think "updateable" should be spelled "updatable"
>> for consistency with the rest of the documentation (although I think
>> both spellings are actually correct).
>>
>>
>> ===
>> Allow the updating of views where only some columns are
>> auto-updateable (Dean Rasheed)
>>
>> Previously the presence of a non-auto-updateable column prevented all
>> columns from being auto-updated. Deletes are now supported on suitable
>> views even if no auto-updateable columns are present.
>> ===
>>
>> I think that puts too much emphasis on deletes, and could be
>> misinterpreted. How about something like this:
>>
>> Allow views to be automatically updatable even if they contain some
>> non-updatable columns (Dean Rasheed)
>>
>> Previously the presence of non-updatable columns such as expressions,
>> literals and functions prevented automatic updates. Now INSERTs,
>> UPDATEs and DELETEs are supported, provided that they do not attempt
>> to assign new values to any of the non-updatable columns.
>
> Agreed. Adjusted attached patch applied. I was never happy with the
> previous awkward auto-update wording.
>

Thanks. There's a typo in the new text though --- "cals" should be "calls".

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-05-14 17:32:43 Re: Cache invalidation bug in RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap()
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-05-14 16:23:23 Re: Cache invalidation bug in RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap()