Re: pgbench--new transaction type

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgbench--new transaction type
Date: 2012-07-16 01:22:36
Message-ID: CAEYLb_Xx+EEH1-htr8cWdAwYJKAttFTEczk1-wMAUJq3hHszkQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1 June 2012 01:02, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Sorry it has taken me a year to get back to this patch. I have wanted
> to use it, and to ask other people to run it and report their results,
> several time recently, so I would like to get it into the core.

Who marked this patch as rejected in the commitfest app? Why?

It would be nice if this information was automatically posted as a
"comment". Surely if a patch is rejected, there should be at least a
one-line explanation.

--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-07-16 01:37:41 Re: [PERFORM] DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-07-16 01:22:28 Re: Closing out the June commitfest