Re: pgsql: Tag 9.1rc1.

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Tag 9.1rc1.
Date: 2011-08-19 14:45:44
Message-ID: CAEYLb_XvmyGe=H2z0C+m7oxg_Huf11a51JWh0pp6gpTZLW7_GA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On 19 August 2011 15:15, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> May I humbly suggest that we actually start calling it "stamp"
> instead, to make it very clear that this is a different operation from
> the "git tag" operation that's done on the tree a bit later?
> Reasonable?

+1

I agree that the ambiguity is pretty confusing, and unnecessarily so.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-08-19 14:48:38 Re: pgsql: Tag 9.1rc1.
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-08-19 14:15:07 Re: pgsql: Tag 9.1rc1.