From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Help me develop new commit_delay advice |
Date: | 2012-08-02 18:04:51 |
Message-ID: | CAEYLb_Xu=Wk6tdmN8Gk0aS5xir8qm8XKxJrGVQCEQJaAO8Os6w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On 29 July 2012 16:39, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Many of you will be aware that the behaviour of commit_delay was
> recently changed. Now, the delay only occurs within the group commit
> leader backend, and not within each and every backend committing a
> transaction:
I've moved this to the pgsql-performance list. Please continue the
discussion there.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-08-02 18:49:45 | Re: Re: SPGiST versus hot standby - question about conflict resolution rules |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-08-02 18:02:33 | [repost] Help me develop new commit_delay advice |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2012-08-02 20:13:01 | Re: query using incorrect index |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-08-02 18:02:33 | [repost] Help me develop new commit_delay advice |