Re: Reduced power consumption in autovacuum launcher process

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reduced power consumption in autovacuum launcher process
Date: 2011-07-19 08:42:06
Message-ID: CAEYLb_X0njXUiemak=gobE7EC0DTEv=W1yRXA8Q2KbLfFZCQQQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 18 July 2011 20:06, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hmm.  Well, it's not too late to rethink the WaitLatch API, if we think
>> that that might be a significant limitation.
>
> Right, we can easily change the timeout argument to be in milliseconds
> instead of microseconds.

+1

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pasman pasmański 2011-07-19 08:43:43 Exclude core dumps from project - example patch
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2011-07-19 08:08:34 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Cascading replication feature for streaming log-based replicatio