Re: remove dead ports?

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: remove dead ports?
Date: 2012-05-05 16:23:54
Message-ID: CAEYLb_WhU4sWuau6k8haLXjPuRn+hBauGtp3Bek30VcRmeg5PQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5 May 2012 09:59, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Based on these emerging criteria, should we also remove the other
> platforms on my original "marginal" list?
>
> irix

Well, there hasn't been an IRIX release since 2006, and silicon
graphics is defunct. The SGI brand lives on, though I think that that
organisation isn't in any meaningful sense a successor - certainly,
they don't produce the IRIX workstations (or any other) that were the
main business of SGI for so long.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-05-05 16:37:31 Re: remove dead ports?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-05-05 16:08:00 Re: remove dead ports?