Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, david(at)fetter(dot)org, aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca, stark(at)mit(dot)edu
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Date: 2012-03-02 16:58:01
Message-ID: CAEYLb_WPkbZir93etGGSiGNwN4Km0LUn2GsPN5-fSXCepjkuOA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 23 February 2012 01:39, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for testing this.  The graph obscures a bit how much percentage
> change we're talking about here - could you post the raw tps numbers?

Sorry for not following up on this until now. The report is available from:

http://pagechecksum.staticloud.com/

Note that detailed latency figures for each test are not available in
this report, so only the main page is available, but that gets you the
raw tps numbers.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2012-03-02 17:35:23 Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-03-02 16:54:28 Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays