Re: Sensitivity to drive failure?

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Israel Brewster <israel(at)ravnalaska(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Sensitivity to drive failure?
Date: 2015-10-03 01:54:07
Message-ID: CAEYLb_WMc0bX3Edvj_CkAdyF3CiT+2Vc_oQ9TYD_eBqhDhJc9A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I think it would be really handy if temp_tablespaces were made resilient
against everything going away in the event of a hard crash.

--
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dane Foster 2015-10-03 04:03:38 Re: Shouldn't "WHEN (OLD.* IS DISTINCT FROM NEW.*)" clause be independent from data type?
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2015-10-02 23:38:53 Re: "global" & shared sequences