| From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation |
| Date: | 2011-12-05 00:14:33 |
| Message-ID: | CAEYLb_W0aQ-7-riy=jg5BYGO4e-wuYqZo95FrQeZ5-uqB7RdLg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4 December 2011 19:17, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I have not done any performance testing on this patch, but it might be
> interesting to check it with the same test cases Peter's been using.
I've attached a revision of exactly the same benchmark run to get the
results in results_server.ods .
You'll see very similar figures to results_server.ods for HEAD and for
my patch, as you'd expect. I think the results speak for themselves. I
maintain that we should use specialisations - that's where most of the
benefit is to be found.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| results_server_new.ods | application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet | 12.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2011-12-05 00:16:20 | Re: why local_preload_libraries does require a separate directory ? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-12-04 23:06:01 | Re: why local_preload_libraries does require a separate directory ? |