Re: Why is wal_writer_delay limited to 10s?

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why is wal_writer_delay limited to 10s?
Date: 2014-02-01 23:52:35
Message-ID: CAEYLb_W0FgHQaU45d=BGs7QXaeXEPaGPg2+Jmzh65x0eEweDFA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Peter Geoghegan
<peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> What Postgres version? The WAL Writer will hibernate on Postgres 9.2+.

Of course, it will still write things out at a steady rate if they're
there to write. However, there is no reason to think you couldn't
change things in guc.c to have the upper bound increased. You might
even propose a patch to do so.

--
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2014-02-02 00:26:18 Re: Transparent exchange BDE from Oracle to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-02-01 23:48:25 Re: Why is wal_writer_delay limited to 10s?