| From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Deprecating RULES |
| Date: | 2012-10-19 21:22:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAEYLb_W-gveGKu3Rw1RgfyKTE5kwx7oVSpmpmFB8Wj3+N77QVg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 19 October 2012 22:03, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Unless the easiest way to implement MERGE is to extend RULEs.
FWIW, I'd say that's probably about the hardest possible way to
implement MERGE, assuming that we prioritise providing robust UPSERT
support, as I strongly feel we should.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-10-19 21:29:49 | Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-10-19 21:20:06 | Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys |