Re: enhanced error fields

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: enhanced error fields
Date: 2012-12-28 20:46:55
Message-ID: CAEYLb_VbCLOb44OFZ98UNMc0wy+ADvVXMeGMXdjAT+v_0R9rFA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 28 December 2012 20:40, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> It cannot to wait to GET DIAGNOSTICS request - because when GET
> DIAGNOSTICS is called, then all unsupported info about exception is
> lost, all used memory will be released.

I'm not suggesting that you do. I'm only suggesting that the two are
not comparable.

--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-12-28 20:48:47 Re: foreign key locks
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-12-28 20:40:48 Re: enhanced error fields