From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hash id in pg_stat_statements |
Date: | 2012-10-02 19:09:35 |
Message-ID: | CAEYLb_UQnx1+Q7+gPHyssBCpVH55niM4dfwd43zGe8_tYW5Fnw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2 October 2012 17:58, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Right, and that's all I'm trying to address here- how do we provide a
> value for a given query which can be relied upon by outside sources,
> even in the face of a point release which changes what our internal hash
> value for a given query is.
I don't know of a way. Presumably, we'd hope to avoid this, and would
look for alternatives to anything that would necessitate bumping
PGSS_FILE_HEADER, while not going so far as to let pg_stat_statements
contort things in the core system. If I was aware of a case where this
would have come up had pg_stat_statements fingerprinting been around
at the time, perhaps I could give a better answer than that.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-10-02 19:14:29 | Re: CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-10-02 19:08:16 | Re: CREATE SCHEMA IF NOT EXISTS |