From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: remove dead ports? |
Date: | 2012-05-03 16:39:28 |
Message-ID: | CAEYLb_U5BLNrunX0sDXuCkBGYxHyd=tXp54g7=SOnd3oqU25Jw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3 May 2012 17:21, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> I think I was the only user left; I have never heard from a BSD/OS user
> in the past 5-7 years.
I'm inclined to agree with Bruce. While it's not reasonable to assume
that the lack of a BSD/OS user complaining on -general indicates that
there are none, it's also not reasonable for them to expect us to
support their operating system for 8 years after the original
proprietary vendor. Better to not support BSD/OS than to supply a port
that no one really has any confidence in. It's not as if we've ceased
support in release branches.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-05-03 16:41:40 | Re: "unexpected EOF" messages |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-05-03 16:37:54 | CLOG extension |