Re: Can't explain db size

From: Matteo Grolla <matteo(dot)grolla(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Can't explain db size
Date: 2015-12-15 11:11:12
Message-ID: CAEW0--j4Wd5Ja7tjM7SHbg+G+ZwVia2aywEWG8a+vWXOPuWvoA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Thanks Andreas,
Il try

2015-12-15 11:07 GMT+01:00 Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net>:

> Matteo Grolla <matteo(dot)grolla(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >
> > -------Questions----------------
> >
> > 1) Can you explain me the big difference between the result in A for
> table
> > alf_node_properties: 17GB and the result in B: ~6GB ?
> >
> > 2) Can you explain me the difference between the result in B: ~6GB and
> the
> > result in C, the sum of all column sizes, 3717MB ?
>
> Maybe there are some dead tuples, run a VACUUM FULL (be careful, it
> requires an explicit lock). And please keep in mind that a table
> can contains indexes and other objects. A nice explanation and some ways
> to gather informations on table-, index- and database sizes can you find
> here:
>
> http://andreas.scherbaum.la/blog/archives/282-table-size,-database-size.html
>
>
> Regards, Andreas
> --
> Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
> unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
> "If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknown)
> Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mathieu VINCENT 2015-12-17 09:10:42 Re: Estimation row error
Previous Message Gunnar "Nick" Bluth 2015-12-15 10:21:57 Re: Estimation row error