Re: Why is parula failing?

From: Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, tharar(at)amazon(dot)com
Subject: Re: Why is parula failing?
Date: 2024-05-16 10:48:43
Message-ID: CAEP4nAzTOf5=HhWHu6bZObMhVJx8dkPMYgPhp27JYKnYd0RsVQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 14 May 2024 at 08:55, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I've not seen any recent failures from Parula that relate to this
> issue. The last one seems to have been about 4 weeks ago.
>
> I'm now wondering if it's time to revert the debugging code added in
> 1db689715. Does anyone think differently?
>

Thanks for keeping an eye. Sadly the older machine was decommissioned
and thus parula hasn't been sending results to buildfarm the past few days.

I'll try to build a similar machine (but newer gcc etc.) and reopen this
thread in case I hit
something similar.
-
robins

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-05-16 11:35:29 Re: GUC names in messages
Previous Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2024-05-16 10:41:50 Re: PostgreSQL 17 Beta 1 release announcement draft