Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23)

From: Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Sam James <sam(at)gentoo(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23)
Date: 2024-12-15 07:04:23
Message-ID: CAEP4nAwLPcD+ZR4wEKWG2z+jR0FVyFOwairNCY37J1i3CMVEnQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 at 03:35, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

>
> Nowadays run_branches' check for whether there's something to do is
> cheap enough that it's not worth skipping. So it's recommendable
> to just launch that every so often, and not complicate your life
> with manual per-branch scheduling.
>

Thanks for explaining / confirming.
I'll update the remaining machine configurations soon.

-
robins

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message myzhen 2024-12-17 11:51:44 to_timestamp function calculation error
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-12-14 17:04:50 Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23)