Re: [PATCH v1] eliminate duplicate code in table.c

From: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] eliminate duplicate code in table.c
Date: 2022-07-21 15:05:38
Message-ID: CAEG8a3Kwdw5qY8ZwP4=Meemd9jmZRda4OSGiC9OxRSE8gDLv6g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

yeah, IMHO validate_relation_kind() is better ;)

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 10:21 PM Aleksander Alekseev
<aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> > Yep, validate_relation_type() sounds better.
>
> Or maybe validate_relation_kind() after all?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Aleksander Alekseev

--
Regards
Junwang Zhao

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2022-07-21 15:07:55 Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v70
Previous Message Amit Langote 2022-07-21 14:55:16 Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size