a potential typo in comments of pg_parse_json

From: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: a potential typo in comments of pg_parse_json
Date: 2024-07-08 08:24:49
Message-ID: CAEG8a3KPi=LayiTwJ11ikF7bcqnZUrcj8NgX0V8nO1mQKZ9GfQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Not 100% sure, sorry if this doesn't make sense.

--- a/src/common/jsonapi.c
+++ b/src/common/jsonapi.c
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ freeJsonLexContext(JsonLexContext *lex)
*
* If FORCE_JSON_PSTACK is defined then the routine will call the non-recursive
* JSON parser. This is a useful way to validate that it's doing the right
- * think at least for non-incremental cases. If this is on we expect to see
+ * thing at least for non-incremental cases. If this is on we expect to see
* regression diffs relating to error messages about stack depth, but no
* other differences.
*/

--
Regards
Junwang Zhao

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2024-07-08 08:31:08 Re: Partial aggregates pushdown
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2024-07-08 08:05:38 Re: Parallel CREATE INDEX for GIN indexes