| From: | Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Non-decimal integer literals |
| Date: | 2022-10-11 10:16:08 |
| Message-ID: | CAEG8a3KKRUm2LV6EZqz-8rdkPSZuUUg_JZw8Jt2AZM+eHx0fFQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 4:59 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 11.10.22 05:29, Junwang Zhao wrote:
> > What do you think if we move these code into a static inline function? like:
> >
> > static inline char*
> > process_digits(char *ptr, int32 *result)
> > {
> > ...
> > }
>
> How would you handle the different ways each branch checks for valid
> digits and computes the value of each digit?
>
Didn't notice that, sorry for the noise ;(
--
Regards
Junwang Zhao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-10-11 10:57:06 | Re: create subscription - improved warning message |
| Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2022-10-11 10:05:01 | Re: Is there any plan to support online schem change in postgresql? |