Re: general purpose array_sort

From: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, "andreas(at)proxel(dot)se" <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: general purpose array_sort
Date: 2025-04-01 23:25:12
Message-ID: CAEG8a3Jifzrc59J1Kcb0JcBfYvhzSEcrig+12f_6wfXr_zxrpA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 6:05 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 1:11 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Attached 0001 is the same as v18, and then 0002 is the proposed
> >> addition to typcache.
>
> > I've applied the patches to master and regression passed.
> > 0002 is neat, I am +1 for this improvement.
>
> Hearing no further comments, pushed.
>
> regards, tom lane

Thanks for pushing, and I noticed the corresponding CF entry has
been marked as committed, thanks for taking care of it.

--
Regards
Junwang Zhao

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2025-04-02 00:13:24 Re: AIO v2.5
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-04-01 23:22:47 Re: Small memory fixes for pg_createsubcriber