Re: [doc] fix a potential grammer mistake

On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 12:42 AM Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 11:15 AM Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Attachment is a corrected version based on Tom's suggestion.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 9:56 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > >
> > > Erikjan Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> writes:
> > > > I don't think these "were"s are wrong but arguably changing them to
> > > > "have" helps non-native speakers (like myself), as it doesn't change the
> > > > meaning significantly as far as I can see.
> > >
> > > I think it does --- it changes the meaning from passive to active.
> > > I don't necessarily object to rewriting these sentences more broadly,
> > > but I don't think "have issued" is the correct phrasing.
> > >
> > > Possibly "The user issued ..." would work.
> > >
>
> Is there a reason that the first case says "just" issued vs the other
> two cases? It seems to me that it should be removed.
Attachment is a patch with the "just" removed.

Thanks
>
> Robert Treat
> https://xzilla.net

--
Regards
Junwang Zhao