Re: Performance on Bulk Insert to Partitioned Table

From: Ali Pouya <alipouya2(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Charles Gomes <charlesrg(at)outlook(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance on Bulk Insert to Partitioned Table
Date: 2013-01-17 14:38:14
Message-ID: CAEEEPmyPNf_6wevxfa8dKyi9mdamchON2G6NJsGmviq3mF5izw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

2012/12/27 Charles Gomes <charlesrg(at)outlook(dot)com>

> So far that's what I got http://www.widesol.com/~charles/pgsql/partition.c
> I had some issues as He uses HeapTuples and on 9.2 I see a Slot.
>

Hi Charles,
I copied your C code partition.c and am trying to test it.

For compiling you suggest :

...
gcc -I "./" -fpic -c trigger.c
...

Where comes the file *trigger.c* from ? Is that the one you find in the
source directory
./src/backend/commands/ ?

Thanks a lot
Best regards
Ali

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles Gomes 2013-01-17 15:01:31 Re: Performance on Bulk Insert to Partitioned Table
Previous Message Horst Dehmer 2013-01-15 23:44:29 Re: Insert performance for large transaction with multiple COPY FROM