From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Pierre Giraud <pierre(dot)giraud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgcommitfest2] Sorting columns |
Date: | 2018-01-03 09:00:52 |
Message-ID: | CAECtzeXcr9J=ZjVHtFuRx_YfHWV_JX6jVubzhSssO+yw7oCUbw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
2018-01-02 21:33 GMT+01:00 Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>:
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Pierre Giraud <pierre(dot)giraud(at)dalibo(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Currently on the patches page the table is sorted on the patch column by
>> default. Latest activity/mail columns are also sortable but no one knows
>> until hovering the column headers. And even when sorting by a column other
>> than patch no arrow is displayed to show the current sorting.
>>
>> Please find attached 2 patches respectively to fix and enhance the
>> columns sorting for the patches table.
>>
>> The attached image shows the result.
>>
>>
>>
> Hi!
>
> Apologies for a very late response to this one. I put it aside for "answer
> quickly", and then promptly forgot.
>
> I agree that the current indication of what's sortable is quite bad. But I
> don't think the new one is that much better -- we should have something
> much more clear than just "different amount of gray", I think.
>
>
I disagree, it looks much better than now with a really small patch.
--
Guillaume.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2018-01-03 18:43:00 | Reorganizing PG lists |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-01-02 21:21:07 | Re: Wiki editor request |