From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Ian Dauncey <Ian(dot)Dauncey(at)bankzero(dot)co(dot)za>, "pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: vacuumlo |
Date: | 2021-09-02 07:33:20 |
Message-ID: | CAECtzeXEiLu1j2UXPFnZmU3sVKuGH5eWb9Z5MxhhB+Stq-AmxQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
Le jeu. 2 sept. 2021 à 07:11, Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com> a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Don’t you think it as a drawback of postgres that such temporary files
> don’t get deleted automatically once the transaction gets committed or
> rolled back .
>
>
They are automatically removed in case of a proper commit or rollback. They
aren't in case of a crash.
Could you suggest a good permanent solution for such case.
>
>
You should try https://github.com/bdrouvot/pg_orphaned to find the list of
orphaned files. It does a pretty good job at it.
--
Guillaume.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-09-02 07:50:52 | Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements? |
Previous Message | Shaish Guni | 2021-09-02 05:13:56 | Re: vacuumlo |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-09-02 08:08:19 | Re: oldest WAL files not removed |
Previous Message | o.lepretre | 2021-09-02 06:21:37 | RE: oldest WAL files not removed |